Attendance: Leon Wagner Andrew Haley Willem Botha Gerald Wodni Bernd Paysan Ulrich Hoffmann Anton Ertl Willi Stricker Stephen Pelc Peter Knaggs Voting: Willi Stricker is allowed to Vote: 9Y:0:0 2. Minutes of last meeting 2 amendments to draft minutes accepted with these two amendments 10Y:0:0 3. Review of Forth 2011.1 Discussion including various proposals for minor changes 7. Consideration of the Candidate Release a) Review of rc0 b,c,d,f) Chapter 5, Annex B, Annex E is left unchanged, Annex C is deleted 10Y:0:0 e) Annex D D.1-D.6 written by Peter Knaggs and accepted 10Y:0:0 D.7 written by Peter Knaggs and Anteon Ertl and accepted D.8 Use list of new words written by Peter Knaggs; accepted f) Started revision of Annex E, deferred the rest to Leon Wagner 4. Consideration of proposals (CfV) a) S-to-F Discussion about F>S (overspecified in CfV) Bernd Paysan drafts a new specification based on F>D accepted the proposal with Bernd Paysan's F>S specification 5. Consideration of draft proposals (RfDs) 6. Wording changes Discussion of wording change proposed for SUSTITUTE 10Y:0:0 Rationale of PARSE cleaned up 10Y:0:0 9. Matters arising TO Rationale revised Wording changes: Occurences of "via" and "assign" examined and often revised Address arithmetic: Revise stack effects Revised Annex A (mostly deletion of differences between Forth-83 and -94; read Forth-94 if you want that) A.18: Bernd Paysan will write rationale for the words of the xchar wordset How to proceed: There will be a draft (12) and a Snapshot release candidate (rc1) ideally released by SVFig Forth Day (there needs to be a committee vote first). Then a 6-month review period; any responses should be made through a bug tracker, get assigned to a committee member for drafting a response, and eventually committe consensus for the response. Formal standards body: Discussion on whether we shout get the blessing of a formal standards body. There is no enthusiasm for that, but no decision was taken.